The Evolution of Communication

Debate serious and interesting topics, rant about politics or pop culture, or otherwise converse in essay form about your opinions. The rules of conduct here are a little stricter.
Hawaii Five-Oh
Posts: 919
Joined: 2009.03.06 (19:50)

Postby blackson » 2008.11.28 (03:58)

Often times when I'm on my computer, my parents will tell me how sad it is that I have no social life. However, I'm on aim, and the forums, talking with many more people then I would be able to away from the computer.

Is that a good thing? Is IM'ing 20 people at once rather then having a face to face conversation a step forward, or backwards? I've noticed while going to school on the bus, everyone has iPods in, or some form of music. Two people sitting next to each other maybe exchange two words with each other in a twenty minute ride. Back before iPod's, this was not the case. Texting is a handy form of communication at times, but it has totally killed phone conversations. No kids I know really talk on the phone anymore.

Is technology enhancing sociology, or killing it?

User avatar
Jedi Pimp
Posts: 676
Joined: 2008.09.27 (23:41)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Erik-Player :://[[];lg
MBTI Type: ISFP
Location: Round Rock, Texas

Postby Erik-Player » 2008.11.28 (04:04)

I say killing it. You can't get the full impact of what someone says. Someone may emphasize on a word but you don't know so you get the wrong message. Going with me?
Image
are any of my friends still here

Hawaii Five-Oh
Posts: 919
Joined: 2009.03.06 (19:50)

Postby blackson » 2008.11.28 (04:06)

I agree. It would be best to have a happy medium. Sometimes texting, or IM'ing is the best thing. When it's not, go farking see who you want to talk to. At this rate, people are going to be going on dates via webcam.

Please don't swear in Debate when it's not needed. - Twisty

Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1541
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:19)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Huntington, WV
Contact:

Postby Kablizzy » 2008.11.28 (04:24)

If you do it right, it enhances social interaction. But for the most part, it only makes social settings that much more implausible.
Image
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.

User avatar
Jedi Pimp
Posts: 676
Joined: 2008.09.27 (23:41)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Erik-Player :://[[];lg
MBTI Type: ISFP
Location: Round Rock, Texas

Postby Erik-Player » 2008.11.28 (04:26)

Kablizzy wrote:If you do it right, it enhances social interaction. But for the most part, it only makes social settings that much more implausible.
Spot on.
Image
are any of my friends still here

User avatar
Mr. Glass
Posts: 2019
Joined: 2008.09.27 (20:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/astheoceansblue
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: up down left right start A start

Postby a happy song » 2008.11.28 (04:59)

Kablizzy wrote:If you do it right, it enhances social interaction. But for the most part, it only makes social settings that much more implausible.
I'm with that!
click sig :::
spoiler


n
::: astheoceansblue
::: My eight episode map pack: SUNSHINEscience
::: Map Theory: The Importance of Function & Form

-
M U S I C
::: The forest and the fire: myspace
::: EP available for FREE download, here.

-
A R T
::: Sig & Avatar Artwork by me - see here!

-
G A M I N G
::: Steam ID: 0:1:20950734
::: Steam Username: brighter


User avatar
Dance Dance Revolution Android
Posts: 881
Joined: 2008.09.28 (02:06)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/TribulatioN
MBTI Type: ESFP
Location: Canada

Postby TribulatioN » 2008.11.28 (05:10)

Don't forget that if you're too drawn into the cyberways of communication, you might become more nervous face to face, and that could seriously screw around with your relationships.

But I'd say that it's perfectly normal to talk through the Internet, cause you're still yourself right? Unless it's your alter-ego talking on the Internet, then that might be a problem.
[ispoiler=http://i31.tinypic.com/111p9bo.png]gloomp : gloomp : Why Me : toasters : SkyRay : Slurpee@fpsbanana : KaMikA@Haklabs[/ispoiler]ImageImage[spoiler=Neditor Nation]Currently Challenging: lord_day
Image[/spoiler][spoiler=Puzzle of the Exuberant!]Image
Image
ImageImageImageImageImage[/spoiler]

User avatar
Demon Fisherman
Posts: 1265
Joined: 2008.09.19 (06:28)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
MBTI Type: ENTP

Postby blue_tetris » 2008.11.28 (06:18)

Yeah, the Internet gives people false expectations about real communication.
Image
The Real N Sex on the Xerox Space Pimp Online Super Fluffy Pack 1! Super Fluffy Pack 2! Super Crunchy Pack! Mother Thumping Impossible: 2005 MotY! Time is on My Side: 2006 PMotY! Survival map king! Best humor award! Best satire award! Best voice award! Inadvertently intimidating! Assholier than thou! Gdubs is totally back! WIS 14! Cyberzone creator! Clique creator! Most lines on IRC! Ventrilo moderator and regular! Certified Dungeon Master! Most modest person ever! ENTP! Incorrigible alcoholic! CHA 19! AMERICAN! Least pretentious! Elitist extraordinaire! Liberal libertarian! Incapable of experiencing love! Check Safe! Commodore of the Eldritch Seas! Archmagus of the Eleventh Hall! Sheriff of the Uncharted West! Godfather of the IRC Mafia! Pun enthusiast! Quadster! Challenging Dunbar's number! Wikipedian!Approves of 4th Edition! 1,000 Blank White Cards! radio_free_tetris! Migratory! INT 18! Doesn't know when he's being genuine, therefore cannot form lasting relationships with people! Really into black chicks! Even more into Indian chicks and Blasians! Hates moderators! Loves the C word! Tronster! Thinks we should play more Worms! Always wins iSketch! Owns a Wii! Plays as Pikachu in Smash Bros! Wrote literotica! Wrote anime fanfic! Sorta into Asians! Lived and loved the 80's and 90's! Chattiest sig! Cyberzone ][ creator! Operand of the Greater Space Pimp Continuum! Helped lead the forum move!Wizard Date! Participated in the blue_tetris takeover! Pithiest one-liners! Walkin' on, walkin' on broken glass! Seems to have an invisible touch! Economist! Mario hackster! Owner of the most complex D&D campaign setting! Micromanagerial! FREEDOM is all-American! Slowly distancing! Supports the Democrats! Supports the old GOP! CATO Institute fanboy! Penn and Teller fan! Large, in charge, and on a barge! Heralded by community as genius hero! Proud yet humble recipient of the Mare & Raigan Award for 2008! CON 9! Dave of Nazareth! Communist is annoyed with me! Not half bad at images! F.Y.I. I am a medic! It's a spook house, lame ball. Too bad! Space Pimp II: Rags 2 Bitches! F.Y.I. I am a spy! Entire team is babbies! STR 10! Sorta appreciating scythe and atob again, for new reasons! Played CS:S briefly! Welcome to Nebraska! Do you think you can Live! Heist! Portrayer of the mighty 88 Shells! Joyous proprietor of the future estate of Kablizzy and blue_tetris! It's Batmen all the way up! They brought crystals to a sceince fight; that's a good way to lose your cat! Even SlappyMcGee! I'm about to run out of either primates or sexually transmitted diseases! One-upper! Toaster oven clairvoyant Mythomaniac! That's the Magic of Macy's! Half of Half! Spend all my time making love, all my love making time!

Hawaii Five-Oh
Posts: 919
Joined: 2009.03.06 (19:50)

Postby blackson » 2008.11.28 (06:27)

blue_tetris wrote:Yeah, the Internet gives people false expectations about real communication.
Hmm...

Maybe that's a true statement.

User avatar
Loquacious
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Guitar_Hero_Matt
Location: lacks whiskers of mass destruction.

Postby MattKestrel » 2008.11.28 (16:15)

blue_tetris wrote:Yeah, the Internet gives people false expectations about real communication.
Yeah, I agree with that too. The distinction has to be made between talking via forums and actually talking to someone.
Image

User avatar
Yet Another Harshad
Posts: 451
Joined: 2008.10.07 (19:00)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Naczz
Location: Where Fifa 2010 is being held, also where a trading post from uk to india was seup 300 yrs ago
Contact:

Postby NicNac14 » 2008.11.28 (17:54)

It depends where..
I socialise alot.. and i must say I have a bit more friends that are girls than boys in the real world..
on my bus we chat alot face to face and its often 7-10 people in that conversation..
when alone.. and don't have the chance to get together and talk I find its fine to chat on irc or something..
I was at a party once (actually quite often..) any way at that party.. well , it was rather sad but everybody was on their fone chatting to the person right next to them.. very sad indeed..
I mean c'mon why waste money to say hi by fone when you can go up to them and give them a hug and say hi .. is it worth it?
i think not..
on a social occasion i think its stupid to be on the fone but while alone its fine...
like now.. I hope..
spoiler

I do Sigs... Want one? ImageI made this one..


^click^.

User avatar
Depressing
Posts: 1977
Joined: 2008.09.26 (06:46)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Trenton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Postby Tanner » 2008.12.02 (13:08)

My greatest dislike as far as changes in communication caused by technology are concerned is the fact that it seems to have left everyone unable to spell basic words.

Phone. It's spelled phone. Not "fone".

srsly tho. it sux
Image
'rret donc d'niaser 'vec mon sirop d'erable, calis, si j't'r'vois icitte j'pellerais la police, tu l'veras l'criss de poutine de cul t'auras en prison, tabarnak

User avatar
The 700 Club
Posts: 743
Joined: 2008.09.30 (07:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/jackass77
MBTI Type: ESFJ
Location: Australia

Postby jackass » 2008.12.02 (13:16)

rennaT wrote:My greatest dislike as far as changes in communication caused by technology are concerned is the fact that it seems to have left everyone unable to spell basic words.

Phone. It's spelled phone. Not "fone".

srsly tho. it sux
Im guessing you purposly mispelled "seriously though, it sucks" after correcting nicnac14 in fone (phone)?

And i think its alright to socialise over internet and stuff as long as your alone like nicnac said
but sometimes when i have a mate around we both sit on the computer on msn chatting to people but we still talk normally to eachother ... do you think thats ok?
[align=center]Image
Mine :: Techno :: Incluye :: GTM ::Skyline :: Riobe :: GTM 2[/align]

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2008.12.02 (16:14)

jackass wrote:
rennaT wrote:My greatest dislike as far as changes in communication caused by technology are concerned is the fact that it seems to have left everyone unable to spell basic words.

Phone. It's spelled phone. Not "fone".

srsly tho. it sux
Im guessing you purposly mispelled "seriously though, it sucks" after correcting nicnac14 in fone (phone)?
That's one heck of a conclusion.

I don't ever talk on the phone. Ever. I talk in person, a lot. The only time it's awkward is when I'm talking to people who are a couple years older than me (e.g. juniors and seniors) at school.
I text when at home...my sister often texts me telling me to get off the piano because it's annoying her. (She's psycho, but I guess it's reasonable.) I also Facebook chat for a large chunk of my life, since I never stray from the computer except on weekends and when going to school.
Image

Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1541
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:19)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Huntington, WV
Contact:

Postby Kablizzy » 2008.12.02 (17:55)

jackass wrote:
rennaT wrote:My greatest dislike as far as changes in communication caused by technology are concerned is the fact that it seems to have left everyone unable to spell basic words.

Phone. It's spelled phone. Not "fone".

srsly tho. it sux
Im guessing you purposly mispelled "seriously though, it sucks" after correcting nicnac14 in fone (phone)?
BAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AHAHAAHHAAHAHHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAGAHAAHAHA!
Image
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2008.12.02 (19:37)

Kablizzy wrote:
jackass wrote:
rennaT wrote:My greatest dislike as far as changes in communication caused by technology are concerned is the fact that it seems to have left everyone unable to spell basic words.

Phone. It's spelled phone. Not "fone".

srsly tho. it sux
Im guessing you purposly mispelled "seriously though, it sucks" after correcting nicnac14 in fone (phone)?
BAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AHAHAAHHAAHAHHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAGAHAAHAHA!
I rest my case, sir.
Image

User avatar
Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1568
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/origami_alligator
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: Portland, Oregon

Postby origami_alligator » 2008.12.02 (22:43)

What I see happening here is just the next step of communication.

As far as I think most of us can tell, a lot of our history was passed down verbally. There was only the means for verbal communication anyway.

Then we hit "the dawn of history" as some people call it, because this is when Sumer created a written language. Something more concrete than verbal communication, each symbol had a certain sound and from that point on history has been passed down as both verbal and symbolic versions.

Now we're at a point where verbal communication isn't as easily accessible as symbolic communication. We can send letters and words much easier than talking to another person. Symbolic communication allows you to have some time to think about what you're going to say before you say it.

I dunno, it seems pretty okay with me. I agree with rennaT though, people need spell-checkers on everything these days.
Image
.,,,,,@

"Listening intently, the thoughts linger ever vibrant. Imagine knowledge intertwined, nostalgiacally guiding/embracing."
<Kaglaxyclax> >>> southpaw has earned the achievement "Heartbreaker".
Promoted to the rank of Ultimate Four by LittleViking
[15:34] <Brttrx> ADDICTION IS GOOD, MR BAD INFLUENCE
[20:05] <southpaw> 8:05pm, Wednesday, 29 April, 2009, southpaw completed N.
[22:49] <makinero> is it orange-orange-gold yellow gold silverthread forest urban chic orange-gold?


Member
Posts: 26
Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:18)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Sockmonkey
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: England

Postby Sockmonkey » 2008.12.02 (23:08)

The way I interact over the internet is much different to how I interact with I see my friends face to face. I would much rather see people face to face than talk to twice as many people over the internet.

Because of where I live it isn't always possible to cycle 10 miles to a friends house after school and then cycle back when it's dark, so for me communicating through technology is - although least preferred - used often.

When combining technology with the old face to face social aspects I feel that technology is increasing peoples social interaction, but when only technology is used it will 'disable' the user from holding real life conversations.
I gave Snuggletummy a catgirl.
I gave Stephen a sperm.
I gave lord_day herpes.
I gave kirby a blowjob.
I gave Brttrx a steak.
I gave Sockmonkey a 220% warn. <3 -Blizz
Pawz gave me a sig.

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2008.12.02 (23:20)

Sockmonkey wrote:Because of where I live it isn't always possible to cycle 10 miles to a friends house after school and then cycle back when it's dark.
Exactly my problem. I live in a different county from all of my friends because of the location of my school, so I never get to socialize.
Image

User avatar
La historia me absolverá
La historia me absolverá
Posts: 2228
Joined: 2008.09.19 (14:27)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/maestro
MBTI Type: INTP
Location: Beijing
Contact:

Postby 乳头的早餐谷物 » 2008.12.03 (08:14)

I haven't spoken to anyone in over three years. My jaw has decayed and I find it difficult to utter simple phonemes.

srsly tho. it sux
M E A T N E T 1 9 9 2

Image

User avatar
Can't Touch This
Posts: 346
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:51)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Triptolemus
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
Location: Come to think of it....I have no idea.

Postby BNW » 2008.12.04 (00:04)

I've never been that good at socializing to many kids at once. Most of my life, I've had maybe 4 or 5 friends at the most that I hang out with. Finding this community may have actually boosted me socializing.

Technology, I think, hasn't deterred anyone from social communication, it has only created a means of reducing the amount of effort it takes to have a conversation with someone.
"I'm going to live forever, or die trying."
Izzy's Personal Forum Dronies winner of "Least Colorful Person"
Image
Sigs!
==---Maestro's---== | Incluye's! | Izzy's! | Be_Happy_:)'s | notkitt's!!
T3chno's! | TMM's! | GTM's! | Sniperwhere's | NicNac14's!! | ---------------Pawz!
toasters | RedSham's! | Jackass's | Why Me's | Gloomp's!

User avatar
Albany, New York
Posts: 521
Joined: 2008.09.28 (02:00)
MBTI Type: INTJ
Location: Inner SE Portland, OR
Contact:

Postby jean-luc » 2008.12.04 (02:48)

Although I think web-based communication is the next step in the process of communications, it is an extension of face-to-face communications, not a replacement for them. As humans, we still have an inate desire to meet face-to-face. It is often, however, simpler and more practical to communicate via the internet.

Living in a major city, almost all of my friends live within walking distance, and I can get to any of their houses via bus (and buses aren't considered 'ghetto' here in Portland like they seem to be in other places - everyone rides them), and I see most of them every day at my school. Nonetheless I still talk to them all the time via Google Talk or whatever.
I have other friends in foreign countries. It's obviously impractical to walk over to their houses (the nearest foreign country is 300 miles away...), so I communicate with them exclusively via the internet. This seems fine too.

Also, I hate talking on the phone. I'm really awkward on the phone, so I always avoid it. I much prefer email or IM, both in personal and business communications.
-- I might be stupid, but that's a risk we're going to have to take. --
Image
Website! Photography! Robots! Facebook!
The latest computers from Japan can also perform magical operations.

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2008.12.04 (07:46)

I tend to be more direct and honest on the Internet than in real life. In real life, there's sometimes the factor of "they might be ridiculous fundies, but it's Thanksgiving dinner and they're my family and I don't want to ruin that".
As a consequence, I think people like me more on the Internet.
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

Wizard Dentist
Posts: 604
Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:04)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/SkyPanda

Postby SkyPanda » 2008.12.04 (12:13)

I prefer real-life communication.. on the internet, I always feel pressured to speak ultra formally because "haha good one dude that rox love ya" isn't really respected so much maybe? Real life communication is so more relaxed and enjoyable.. and extra things like facial expressions and body language and tone mean that its easier to understand people.. on the internet it's so easy to completely misunderstand people.

I would hate to think that technological communication is the 'end' or 'destination' of the evolution of communication.. face-to-face is the way to go. You can't high-five someone over the internet.

User avatar
Depressing
Posts: 1977
Joined: 2008.09.26 (06:46)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Trenton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Postby Tanner » 2008.12.04 (13:09)

SkyPanda wrote:I would hate to think that technological communication is the 'end' or 'destination' of the evolution of communication.. face-to-face is the way to go. You can't high-five someone over the internet.
You've obviously never been in Vent while everyone has their uStream going. You still can't high-five someone but you can do most things.
Image
'rret donc d'niaser 'vec mon sirop d'erable, calis, si j't'r'vois icitte j'pellerais la police, tu l'veras l'criss de poutine de cul t'auras en prison, tabarnak


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests