half-ratings

[Sunset]

How about we map because we all fucking want to. Fuck your ratings. It's a game. If you enjoy what you make, it's good. Anyone else can go to hell.

[乳头的早餐谷物]

first and foremost, forgive me for reviving this topic, but i didnt want to create a new one

nexx, you write way too much. please be more concise as to not bore your audience. i read the whole first page and it took a long time, but i saw all your (and other's) long-ass posts on the second page and i said hell no

If you're going to revive a two-year-old thread, at least have the common courtesy to read what's already been said. I'd rather have posts by fellows like Nexx with all their boring, well-thought-out details than the kind of embarassing drivel that you just posted.

[AsTimeFliesBy]

If you're going to revive a two-year-old thread, at least have the common courtesy to read what's already been said. I'd rather have posts by fellows like Nexx with all their boring, well-thought-out details than the kind of embarassing drivel that you just posted.

what? who are you to say my post was nonsense? i was being clear and concise, exercising my right to express my opinion. long, boring speeches dont convey their message or captivate their audience very well. good writing isnt boring

[squibbles]

what? who are you to say my post was nonsense?

[AsTimeFliesBy]

doesnt make his word gold

[mintnut]

doesnt make his word gold

It does make his word god though.

[otters~1]

doesnt make his word gold

Actually, there's a little gold key there. Besides, he's right.

[Kablizzy]

If you're going to revive a two-year-old thread, at least have the common courtesy to read what's already been said. I'd rather have posts by fellows like Nexx with all their boring, well-thought-out details than the kind of embarassing drivel that you just posted.

what? who are you to say my post was nonsense? i was being clear and concise, exercising my right to express my opinion. long, boring speeches dont convey their message or captivate their audience very well. good writing isnt boring

I dunno. My writing is unfathomably prolix and captivating like an aflame sack of donkey testicles.

[乳头的早餐谷物]

If you're going to revive a two-year-old thread, at least have the common courtesy to read what's already been said. I'd rather have posts by fellows like Nexx with all their boring, well-thought-out details than the kind of embarassing drivel that you just posted.

what? who are you to say my post was nonsense? i was being clear and concise, exercising my right to express my opinion. long, boring speeches dont convey their message or captivate their audience very well. good writing isnt boring

My post was more a criticism of your attitude than your writing. What really rubbed me the wrong way was that you admitted to not reading the second page of the topic--how can you expect anyone to read your post and give a fuck about what you're saying when you proudly flaunt the fact that you didn't do this for the earlier posters? There's no need to bring your "right to express your opinion" into this--I'm merely expressing my opinion that you sound like a bit of a dick.

[origami_alligator]

it seems like most people dont care to change ratings back, but i think we should because it's more precise. even many who dont care said there should be an average 2.5 rating. so we should just bring all half ratings back. someone also said people are now more inclined to comment, but i diagree. i feel those who rated w/o commenting before are still doing the same (at least on my levels). as mentioned before, ratings are inaccurate due to variances in personal opinion, but taking away half ratings made them even more inaccurate. also mentioned before, im one who finds myself having to decide whether to round up or down. sometimes i feel a level is better than a 3 but not good enough to be a 4. i'll say 3.5 in my comment but idk what to do about the rating.

If it is important to have a true rating that reflects the average map, I say we drop the 0 rating. It no longer has a valid purpose and anyone rating a map a 0 is being mean. Either rate it a 1 or don't rate at all IMO.

The accuracy of the voting system is perfect in that no matter how many decimal places you add the system will never accurately reflect the true value of the map.

[unoriginal name]

it seems like most people dont care to change ratings back, but i think we should because it's more precise. even many who dont care said there should be an average 2.5 rating. so we should just bring all half ratings back. someone also said people are now more inclined to comment, but i diagree. i feel those who rated w/o commenting before are still doing the same (at least on my levels). as mentioned before, ratings are inaccurate due to variances in personal opinion, but taking away half ratings made them even more inaccurate. also mentioned before, im one who finds myself having to decide whether to round up or down. sometimes i feel a level is better than a 3 but not good enough to be a 4. i'll say 3.5 in my comment but idk what to do about the rating.

If it is important to have a true rating that reflects the average map, I say we drop the 0 rating. It no longer has a valid purpose and anyone rating a map a 0 is being mean. Either rate it a 1 or don't rate at all IMO.

The accuracy of the voting system is perfect in that no matter how many decimal places you add the system will never accurately reflect the true value of the map.

Yeah, but I will feel much more satisfied rating x.xx/5 than x/5.