Page 1 of 2

Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (00:26)
by Kablizzy
You don't need to reply to every topic. In fact, most of you don't have anything to say on half of these topics. Post counts will end up being reduced manually if this persists. You know who you are, I know who you are. Please stop.

-The Management

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (01:06)
by unoriginal name
Duly noted.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (05:06)
by Condog
BE_nSPIRED wrote:*Cough, G, *Cough T, *Cough, M. =O

lol no just kidding, also noted, though just for confirmation if we do answer every post with an important point/idea/comment may we. I know its unlikely but can that be called spamming


EDIT: Sorry for spamming, if I have
If it is on topic and contributes something to the discussion, it isn't spam.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (07:46)
by 29403
Spam posts are post with nothing to do with the topic, as I know!
Don't worry sir.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (08:14)
by Eiturlyf
This shit again?

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (08:17)
by 29403
Eiturlyf wrote:This shit again?
As Churchill Insurance dogs say, Oh... YES.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (11:52)
by MattKestrel
Condog wrote:
BE_nSPIRED wrote:*Cough, G, *Cough T, *Cough, M. =O

lol no just kidding, also noted, though just for confirmation if we do answer every post with an important point/idea/comment may we. I know its unlikely but can that be called spamming


EDIT: Sorry for spamming, if I have
If it is on topic and contributes something to the discussion, it isn't spam.
Yeah. I hate how everyone thinks spam is just a numerical basis. It's every bit as reliant on the context of each message.

*SPAM*

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (12:21)
by SlappyMcGee
On a separate note, blackbelmoral is taking a month off after a stern warning.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (13:03)
by Tanner
This Just In?

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (13:11)
by a happy song
rennaT wrote:This Just In?
I reckon we could get a few more flogs out of it.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (17:38)
by otters~1
Eiturlyf wrote:This shit again?
Spam. :)

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (18:51)
by Kablizzy
Really? We're spamming in the spam topic? Seriously? Seriously?

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (19:42)
by Spawn of Yanni
Kablizzy wrote:Really? We're spamming in the spam topic? Seriously? Seriously?
Oh, I dunno. Wouldn't that make it on-topic?

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (19:48)
by Kablizzy
If they were discussing spamming instead of the act thereof, yes. As it is, it's just kinda ironic and a bit infuriating.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (21:50)
by Brainwasher
I was thinking when this topic first came up, of double posting, for irony, but I can't remember why I didn't...
Anyway, I think boredom is more the source of spam than boosting post count, or anything else for that matter...Uoh, everyone near Dave has a free breakfast now. :P

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (22:36)
by DoctorAperture
oh... thats right, blame me for all this

*storms off*

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (23:25)
by TribulatioN
Eternal_//Boredom isn't the cause of spam. Boredom is why we're all here in the first place.
The cause of spam is the unwillingness to post properly.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (23:48)
by otters~1
Hey Blizz, I'm pretty sure my post count just got the hundreds digit taken off, and I haven't even been spamming. Was that you, or someone else, or am I dreaming?

EDIT: For the record I (think) I only had about 150 posts in several months.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.22 (23:53)
by t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư
A handful of 2-day bans couldn't hurt, could they?
I think that's what I'm gonna start handing out for egregious cases of spamming from this point forward.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.23 (00:18)
by blackbelmoral
SlappyMcGee wrote:On a separate note, blackbelmoral is taking a month off after a stern warning.
nope. he found faith again after reminding slappy he doesnt care about his post count

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.23 (02:44)
by Turtle
This will be an interesting process to see taking affect.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.23 (02:46)
by Pheidippides
Kablizzy wrote:You don't need to reply to every topic. In fact, most of you don't have anything to say on half of these topics.
This wasn't a challenge.

Post count isn't the issue. We don't care how much your post count goes up. It just gets ridiculously annoying to see one username plastered across the entire Board Index, especially when the person with that username hasn't made any significant contributions to the multitude of topics he's replied to and doesn't even have the decency to post with proper spelling and grammar. Please, for the love of N, contain yourselves.[/rant]

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.23 (03:07)
by blackbelmoral
you forgot a [rant]
i agree wholeheartedly.
but if you have a good contribution, say it.

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.23 (03:24)
by Pheidippides
There's no way anyone has 42 "good contributions" to make in a scant three hours. Don't you think that's just /slightly/ excessive? Especially at a forum that's only moderately active to begin with?

Re: Spamming

Posted: 2009.01.23 (03:27)
by Erik-Player
Sometimes when I'm bored and feel like spamming I spam myself with pm's instead of topics.