I would like to say something. Not that I don't want to be a reviewer, but I really don't like responsibilities like this.
Anyways, on to my point: If what Pikman says is true, and there are twenty-two reviewers, how can each reviewer make 2-3 reviews a month? o_O
I think that the number of reviewers should be reduced, and each should be forced to be more active about reviewing. I know that it is hard to find a good map sometimes, but I think a couple of hours searching the thousands of maps, you are bound to find one that you like.
OR
I think that a select group of reviewers should be selected each month and have several reviews submitted to the queue. Then from there, atob can sort them out and ready the lineage of reviews, while another group is selected and given the month to write 2-3 reviews.
Inactive reviewers will be removed at the end of the week.
-
- Life Time Achievement Award
- Posts: 263
- Joined: 2008.10.08 (19:42)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Lightning55
Lightning is power, you know, the thing that powers the machine you're on.

Credit to ChaoStar /// I was the 234th member to join the forums.

Credit to ChaoStar /// I was the 234th member to join the forums.
Special Maps I Made
Special maps = Floorguard Jumper, Abstract Race, Tile/Mine Jumper + Action, Unfinished DDA (respectively)
Sig Bars
- Loquacious
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:37)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Guitar_Hero_Matt
- Location: lacks whiskers of mass destruction.
Ownage :PLightning55 wrote:Anyways, on to my point: If what Pikman says is true, and there are twenty-two reviewers, how can each reviewer make 2-3 reviews a month? o_O
Being serious, more than one review submitted a day. 1-2 reviews per month is more likely if we want a fair, even distribution.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests