Inactive reviewers will be removed at the end of the week.

Talk about the Nmaps.net website.

Moderators: Rose, Sunset

Life Time Achievement Award
Posts: 263
Joined: 2008.10.08 (19:42)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Lightning55

Postby Lightning55 » 2008.12.27 (20:24)

I would like to say something. Not that I don't want to be a reviewer, but I really don't like responsibilities like this.

Anyways, on to my point: If what Pikman says is true, and there are twenty-two reviewers, how can each reviewer make 2-3 reviews a month? o_O

I think that the number of reviewers should be reduced, and each should be forced to be more active about reviewing. I know that it is hard to find a good map sometimes, but I think a couple of hours searching the thousands of maps, you are bound to find one that you like.

OR

I think that a select group of reviewers should be selected each month and have several reviews submitted to the queue. Then from there, atob can sort them out and ready the lineage of reviews, while another group is selected and given the month to write 2-3 reviews.
Lightning is power, you know, the thing that powers the machine you're on.
Image
Credit to ChaoStar /// I was the 234th member to join the forums.
Special Maps I Made

Nmaps.netNmaps.netNmaps.netNmaps.net
Special maps = Floorguard Jumper, Abstract Race, Tile/Mine Jumper + Action, Unfinished DDA (respectively)

Sig Bars

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


User avatar
Loquacious
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Guitar_Hero_Matt
Location: lacks whiskers of mass destruction.

Postby MattKestrel » 2008.12.28 (09:34)

Lightning55 wrote:Anyways, on to my point: If what Pikman says is true, and there are twenty-two reviewers, how can each reviewer make 2-3 reviews a month? o_O
Ownage :P

Being serious, more than one review submitted a day. 1-2 reviews per month is more likely if we want a fair, even distribution.
Image


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests