Halo - What does everyone think of it?

Talk about gaming culture and other aspects of PC and console games and systems.

Yay or nay?

Yay!
24
62%
Nay!
14
36%
What?
1
3%
 
Total votes: 39

User avatar
Walking on Broken Glass
Posts: 236
Joined: 2008.10.20 (16:16)

Postby deltainferno » 2009.02.23 (21:07)

none of what i said denys the fact that i love halo 3.
not to mention i would destroy anyone who challenges me.
spoiler

-previous sigs-
Image-GloomP
Image-NicNac14
Image-Universe_Zero
Image-NicNac14
''I shall kill you until you die from it!''

remember kids, If at first you dont succeed, you fail.

I LIKE PIE
do you like pie? if so, copy and paste this into your signiture.

(click sig which was made by Why_Me)

User avatar
Hawaii Five-Oh
Posts: 921
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/condog_111
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Melbourne-ish

Postby Condog » 2009.02.23 (23:14)

I do not like Halo. Three main reasons:
i. There are no bots in multiplayer mode.
ii. I will never be a fan of a game that encourages you to run away and hide when you get hurt.
iii. Only holding two weapons at once.
Image

Ice Climbers are awesome. Deal with it.

User avatar
Yet Another Harshad
Posts: 472
Joined: 2008.09.28 (21:25)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/isaacx
MBTI Type: ISFP
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Postby isaacx » 2009.02.23 (23:30)

i suck at any game that base around guns, or anything close to that
and even if i had an Xbox(360) and wanted it,

and
isaacx wrote:Wii , im not allowed to play any game that's not E rated :(
and if it's not E rated, i have to play with adult supervision.
My parents keep my one and only T game locked away somewhere :((
That really infulences everything as well

so ive grown a love for most mario yoshi kirby etc. games for they are always E and a non-like for anything not except for the SSB series
Image
Image

Triforce
Posts: 3
Joined: 2008.11.20 (05:43)

Postby frogs » 2009.02.23 (23:44)

It should be noted that the opinions expressed below come from someone who considers himself a competitive Halo player. While single player can be entertaining, I spend a monumentally larger amount of time playing multiplayer. So, here goes;

Halo 1 is fantastic. I still occasionaly play campaign (which is saying something) and LAN multiplayer with friends as frequently as possible.

Halo 2 is good. The complexities of the multiplayer helped for the most part, while some of the new aspects (removal of the H1 pistol/AR, and the nerfing of the Plasma Rifle) greatly hindered the gameplay. The game was overall a large step down from it's predecessor, but because I played using MLG settings in custom games and only went into Team Hardcore matchmaking, I was able to eliminate most of the BS and play a more balanced, competitive game.

For those who aren't familiar with MLG (Major League Gaming), it's a company that has gained massive popularity recently for holding video-game tournaments. Halo 1 was originally the only game on their circut, but with the release of Halo 2 they made the switch in an effort to gain a larger audience of gamers.

Halo 3 is solid, but to be completely honest, I can hardly stand the game with default settings. There are just too many easy routes to take when acquiring kills. To mantain proper debate rhetoric I'm going to refrain from using the word "cheap" outright, but there is no denying that Bungie specifically nerfed the entire multiplayer game to put players of different skill levels on a more even playing field. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THE LOGIC BEHIND THIS DECISION. I am in no way blaming them for creating a game that players of all skill levels and ages can enjoy. From a commercial standpoint this decision was a no brainer, but I had a small shred of hope that they might disregard sales for one moment and return Halo to its former SMG-free glory.

Sorry for any typos or grammatical errors.
Last edited by frogs on 2009.07.12 (22:16), edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Slice of Wisdom
Posts: 407
Joined: 2008.09.27 (05:29)

Postby kai » 2009.02.25 (14:31)

Condog wrote:I do not like Halo. Three main reasons:
i. There are no bots in multiplayer mode.
ii. I will never be a fan of a game that encourages you to run away and hide when you get hurt.
iii. Only holding two weapons at once.
1. And yet there are so many servers online? Just go to a nub server or somthing lol. i mean hell, the example i linked down below was made on a server i put up 10 min ago XD.

2. *cough* dunno how you play but if its fps imma run and gun... shield or no shield. just some point where shit can get hairy in single player where you have to duck your head every once and awhile.

3. You need more then 2? O_o


..ahem.

YAY!
for halo 1 + 2... not 3 cause i havn't beat it. The online community can suck at times tho, but the custom edition kicks ASS on big maps with people. I was in a short lived clan where we would focus on flying vehicles and gundem/mechs/walkers in huuUUUUUUUUuuge maps XD.

User avatar
Schlock Schtock and Two Schmoking Barrels
Posts: 814
Joined: 2008.09.26 (13:24)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/chase16/
MBTI Type: ISFJ
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby Chase » 2009.02.26 (15:41)

It's fun, I like it. Is that enough, another example of 'I don't care what others think, if I like it it's enough for me.'

Also the SMG is win, and the BR is overrated even though it's good, there are plenty of other weapons available for use, get a Carbine, it kills faster.
Image

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.02.27 (09:00)

frogs wrote:It should be noted that the opinions expressed below come from someone who consideres himself a competitive Halo player. While single player can be entertaining, I spend a monumentally larger amount of time playing multiplayer. So, here goes;

Halo 1 is fantastic. I still occasionaly play campaign (which is saying something) and LAN multiplayer with friends as frequently as possible.

Halo 2 is good. The complexities of the multiplayer helped for the most part, while some of the new aspects (removal of the H1 pistol/AR, and the nerfing of the Plasma Rifle) greatly hindered the gameplay. The game was overall a large step down from it's predecessor, but because I played using MLG settings in custom games and only went into Team Hardcore matchmaking, I was able to eliminate most of the BS and play a more balanced, competitive game.

For those who aren't familiar with MLG (Major League Gaming), it's a company that has gained massive popularity recently for holding video-game tournaments. Halo 1 was originally the only game on their circut, but with the release of Halo 2 they made the switch in an effort to gain a larger audience of gamers.

Halo 3 is solid, but to be completely honest, I can hardly stand the game with default settings. There are just too many easy routes to take when acquiring kills. To mantain proper debate rhetoric I'm going to refrain from using the word "cheap" outright, but there is no denying that Bungie specifically nerfed the entire multiplayer game to put players of different skill levels on a more even playing field. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THE LOGIC BEHIND THIS DECISION. I am in no way blaming them for creating a game that players of all skill levels and ages can enjoy. From a commercial standpoint this decision was a no brainer, but I had a small shred of hope that they might disregard sales for one moment and return Halo to its former SMG-free glory.

Sorry for any typos or grammatical errors.

Best first post ever.
Loathes

User avatar
Diagnosis Mohawk: Bahrain Cock Theory
Posts: 1405
Joined: 2008.09.23 (13:25)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/spawn_of_yanni
MBTI Type: ENFJ
Location: Pittsburgh

Postby Spawn of Yanni » 2009.02.27 (09:17)

I do believe frogs was on the old forums.
Image
feline disrespect from behind

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.02.27 (13:34)

Right, but it doesn't change the fact that the post is glorious and pristine.
Loathes

User avatar
Demon Fisherman
Posts: 1246
Joined: 2008.10.01 (23:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/squibbles
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Canberra

Postby squibbles » 2009.02.28 (11:38)

yes, he was.

And Halo Wars is AWESOME!
spoiler

Nmaps.net

Tsukatu wrote:I don't know what it is, squibbles, but my brain keeps inserting "black" into random parts of your posts these days.
I totally just read that as, "I'd hate to be the only black guy stuck using v1.4."
[/ispoiler]

User avatar
Remembering Hoxygen
Posts: 972
Joined: 2008.11.02 (06:13)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/rikaninja
Location: The darkness beyond hell.

Postby Rikaninja » 2009.03.01 (08:55)

It's in between, and it uses to much space. But still I would have to round it up to a Yay!
Image

User avatar
Ego Lancer
Posts: 303
Joined: 2008.09.26 (06:13)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/PsychoSnail
MBTI Type: ISTP
Location: The Gaming subforum

Postby PsychoSnail » 2009.03.02 (09:03)

Chase wrote:It's fun, I like it. Is that enough, another example of 'I don't care what others think, if I like it it's enough for me.'

Also the SMG is win, and the BR is overrated even though it's good, there are plenty of other weapons available for use, get a Carbine, it kills faster.
I prefer the BR over Carbine except in no-shield games. I'm not sure why, but it's probably because it feels more satisfying to me to fire it.
spoiler

Image
Opera innovates, Firefox emulates.
Last updated: September 27th, 2009


User avatar
Loquacious
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Guitar_Hero_Matt
Location: lacks whiskers of mass destruction.

Postby MattKestrel » 2009.03.02 (16:15)

PsychoSnail wrote:
Chase wrote:It's fun, I like it. Is that enough, another example of 'I don't care what others think, if I like it it's enough for me.'

Also the SMG is win, and the BR is overrated even though it's good, there are plenty of other weapons available for use, get a Carbine, it kills faster.
I prefer the BR over Carbine except in no-shield games. I'm not sure why, but it's probably because it feels more satisfying to me to fire it.
I'd have to side with Chase here; I prefer the Carbine when I can get one just because it's quicker at medium range. For long range I'd choose the BR because three bullets increase the chance of actually hitting someone, but whenever I can I'll try and get the carbine.
Image

User avatar
Antonio Banderas
Posts: 1703
Joined: 2008.09.26 (13:56)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/donfuy
MBTI Type: ISTP
Location: port

Postby Donfuy » 2009.03.02 (17:14)

First of all, I only played Halo 1: Combat Evolved
GTM wrote:that lacks depth and character in single player.
I highly disagree with you.
Character? C'mon, Master Chief isn't enough for that? The story is good, really good actually. While I was playing it, I had that "feeling of being into the game".


I still play it occasionally.
Image

User avatar
Loquacious
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2008.09.26 (15:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Guitar_Hero_Matt
Location: lacks whiskers of mass destruction.

Postby MattKestrel » 2009.03.02 (17:27)

Maybe I should have phrased that better; I was referring to the single player gameplay, as opposed to storyline, although even that isn't particularly well done either, imo. The gameplay's fine, but it rarely changes from "shoot these guys and press this button" in different, albeit fun guises. That, and the gameplay doesn't feel exactly unique to me. Although Halo 1 had a lot of innovative features back then, things have jumped on the bandwagon so much it's not as impressive to me anymore :/
Image

The number of Electoral College votes needed to be President of the US.
Posts: 274
Joined: 2008.10.07 (00:41)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Location: Utah

Postby spudzalot » 2009.03.02 (19:07)

Its waaaay overrated.
Image

User avatar
Retrofuturist
Posts: 3131
Joined: 2008.09.19 (06:55)
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Postby t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư » 2009.03.02 (21:32)

spudzalot wrote:Its waaaay overrated.
While I find I agree with most of your points, I also find that I disagree with all of them.
...which is to say, post some reasons, or anything meaningful for that matter, if you're going to post. Otherwise, shut your face and stay in the background like a good little girl.
[spoiler="you know i always joked that it would be scary as hell to run into DMX in a dark ally, but secretly when i say 'DMX' i really mean 'Tsukatu'." -kai]"... and when i say 'scary as hell' i really mean 'tight pink shirt'." -kai[/spoiler][/i]
spoiler

Image


User avatar
The Konami Number
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:27)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Atilla

Postby Atilla » 2009.03.02 (23:03)

Donfuy wrote:
GTM wrote:that lacks depth and character in single player.
I highly disagree with you.
Character? C'mon, Master Chief isn't enough for that? The story is good, really good actually.
What? Master Chief is a cardboard cutout ("I'm a super-soldier, and I shoot aliens." Gee, I've never heard that one before...) and the story is cliche ("Aliens are attacking humans. Only you can save mankind. Also there are evil parasite things."), at least as far as the first game goes. I mean, it's presented well enough, but it's not exactly innovative or anything.

Also, Cortana would have been a much better character example than Master Chief, since she actually, y'know, talks and has a personality and things like that.

User avatar
Walking on Broken Glass
Posts: 236
Joined: 2008.10.20 (16:16)

Postby deltainferno » 2009.03.02 (23:13)

cortana would kick cheif's ass any day. too bad about her hair though, she constantly changes it each game.
spoiler

-previous sigs-
Image-GloomP
Image-NicNac14
Image-Universe_Zero
Image-NicNac14
''I shall kill you until you die from it!''

remember kids, If at first you dont succeed, you fail.

I LIKE PIE
do you like pie? if so, copy and paste this into your signiture.

(click sig which was made by Why_Me)

ABC
Posts: 125
Joined: 2009.02.28 (02:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/tomthebomb
Location: Intercourse, Pennsylvania. Buckweed Rd.

Postby tomthebomb » 2009.03.03 (03:09)

nay...hate halo
Image Image Image
  • Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.
    Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
    Girls are like phones. They love to be held, talked too but if you press the wrong button you'll be disconnected!
    There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
    When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.
    You laugh because I'm different...........I laugh cause I just farted!

User avatar
Vampire Salesman
Posts: 120
Joined: 2008.10.10 (20:53)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Contact:

Postby faemir » 2009.03.08 (17:27)

deltainferno wrote:3 things:
- I confess to being a FF fanboy and think you're wrong about FF's being overhyped.
Well too many people claim them to be the best RPGs ever when they really aren't ._. I love my JRPGs as much as anyone, but imo they can't compete with less linear RPGs - it feels more RPGish and satisfying.

Remember: overrated game != bad game.
- GTAIV was the most overhyped game EVER.
Yup.
- and i think halo 3 is a great game, but i dont see the point of buying a game just because either
a) your friends are buying it
b)people have said it is a good game even though you have never played a similar game in your life.
but, i suppose everyone has their own opinions.
I didn't buy it just because my friends are (which is why i'm not getting halo wars). I got it because it was fun to play with my friends. There is a key difference there.
How fatal? - Peter Sellers

The number of Electoral College votes needed to be President of the US.
Posts: 274
Joined: 2008.10.07 (00:41)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Location: Utah

Postby spudzalot » 2009.03.10 (22:42)

Tsukatu wrote:
spudzalot wrote:Its waaaay overrated.
While I find I agree with most of your points, I also find that I disagree with all of them.
...which is to say, post some reasons, or anything meaningful for that matter, if you're going to post. Otherwise, shut your face and stay in the background like a good little girl.
Sorry. Haha.

Well first of all the graphics. Sure they are pretty good but not anything like Call of Duty or Metriod Prime 3. Most of the buildings are these absolute perfect structures with no rubble, or evidence of anything even existing there before. Have some more atmosphere.

Second of all (something that someone else stated) is that you can only carry two guns at one time. I like being able to switch in between a large amount of guns that fit the situation I'm in not just two that you must have out the entire time.

Then the actual body movements of the characters are really lame. Like, I just got shot but I am still holding my gun in the exact same position as before or I jumped of a 10 foot platform but landed perfectly. They need to be a little more animated in my opinion.

Then I just suck at Halo. ._.
Image

The 700 Club
Posts: 732
Joined: 2008.11.19 (00:59)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/greenblack
Location: In the land of the jabberwocky

Postby blackbelmoral » 2009.03.10 (23:23)

book!

i found a demo version with live in my school computer network
YAR HAR!
Image
X2
Sigs:
29403|?NicNac?| Kablamo
Atilla wrote:If I offer a position, particularly one that requires a degree of responsibility and maturity, verbally abusing me because you missed the position will only confirm my belief that you were not the best candidate

User avatar
The number of seats in an Airbus A380
Posts: 558
Joined: 2008.11.13 (01:45)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/slayr
Location: Southern Ontario
Contact:

Postby Slayr » 2009.03.11 (00:13)

ive played halo wars and heres what i hav to say, the campaign is a little annoying(but i dont like any campaigns) but the multiplayer is great but the only downside is that once u beat the enemy army you just stand there for 10 minutes shooting a building, its kind of annoying but wutevr.

User avatar
The Konami Number
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:27)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Atilla

Postby Atilla » 2009.03.11 (00:55)

spudzalot wrote:Second of all (something that someone else stated) is that you can only carry two guns at one time. I like being able to switch in between a large amount of guns that fit the situation I'm in not just two that you must have out the entire time.
I think Halo's weapon limit works well. Which weapons you carry is a strategic choice - you can't just reach into your hyperspace arsenal to pull out whatever you need.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests